- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:21:34 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A41F194B-1E55-4127-85A7-9B0FF652A6ED@kellogg-assoc.com>
There hasn't been much more discussion on this topic, so I propose that we update the requirements as follows: 1. Linked Data is a set of documents, each containing a representation of a linked data graph. 2. A linked data graph is a labeled directed graph, where nodes are subjects or objects, and edges are properties. 3. A subject is any node in a linked data graph with at least one outgoing edge. 4. A subject MAY be labeled with an IRI. 5. A property is an edge of the linked data graph. 6. A property SHOULD be labeled with an IRI. 7. An object is a node in a linked data graph with at least one incoming edge. 8. An object MAY be labeled with an IRI. 9. An IRI that is a label in a linked data graph SHOULD be dereferencable to a Linked Data document describing the labeled subject, object or property. 10. A literal is an object with a label that is not an IRI If I don't hear any negative response, I'll assume that we have consensus to update the Linked Data section [1] of the requirements accordingly. Gregg [1] http://json-ld.org/requirements/latest/#linked-data On Jul 10, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: On 07/05/2011 07:24 PM, Bradley Allen wrote: How about: "A literal is an object with a label that is not an IRI" ? Works for me. Also note that at one point, we were thinking of supporting graph literals in JSON-LD. There is nothing preventing us from still doing this, but let's put that conversation off to another time. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/
Received on Monday, 11 July 2011 16:22:37 UTC