- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:07:37 +0100
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 7/5/11 6:23 PM, Bradley Allen wrote: > Allow me to jump into the breach here with a reworded set of points > that attempt to capture Kingsley's feedback: > > 1. Linked Data is a set of documents, each containing a representation > of a linked data graph. > 2. A linked data graph is a labeled directed graph, where nodes are > subjects or objects, and edges are properties. > 3. A subject is any node in a linked data graph with at least one outgoing edge. > 4. A subject MAY be labeled with an IRI. > 5. A property is an edge of the linked data graph. > 6. A property SHOULD be labeled with an IRI. > 7. An object is a node in a linked data graph with at least one incoming edge. > 8. An object MAY be labeled with an IRI. > 9. An IRI that is a label in a linked data graph SHOULD be > dereferencable to a Linked Data document describing the labeled > subject, object or property. Yep!! de-referencable IRIs are mandatory re. Linked Data. Kingsley > Bradley P. Allen > http://bradleypallen.org > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Gregg Kellogg<gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: >> Kingsley, thanks for the feedback. >> >> If you're requiring as a basic precept that every URI used in an LD graph be de-referencable, this would leave out statements of the set of URIs that are not de-referencable. This would seem to also include URNs. I don't think it's appropriate to limit JSON-LD to use only de-referencable URIs. However, I do believe that a best practice (where feasible) is to use de-referencable URIs, where a suitable representation is returned. >> >> Otherwise, can you suggest a re-wording of the LD points in [1] that would be more accurate? >> >> Gregg >> >> [1] http://json-ld.org/requirements/latest/#linked-data >> >> On Jul 5, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> >>> On 7/5/11 7:09 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: >>>> Topic: Formal Definition of Linked Data >>> First assertion about Linked Data reads: >>> Linked Data is used to represent a directed graph . >>> >>> Sorry, but that's back to front, at best. >>> >>> A directed graph used to represent (describe) an object can be >>> constructed in such a way that subject name, subject attributes, and >>> subject attribute values take the form of de-referencable URIs. >>> >>> In the case of Linked Data, specifically, a URI de-references to a >>> representation of its Referent. It does this because an Object has >>> Identity distinct from its Representation. Thus, an Object has a Name >>> that's distinct from the EAV/SPO graph pictorial that delivers its >>> description (representation). Naturually, on the Web (as is the case >>> with a computer's local OS), said representation exists as the content >>> of a Resource at a location (Address). >>> >>> Of course, you don't have to accept my definition of Linked Data. But >>> note this, bar different turn of phrase, I've just outlined the very >>> essence of TimBL's original Linked Data meme prior to the regressive >>> tweak that added "(RDF* and SPARQL)" to its later revision. The day >>> "(RDF* and SPARQL)" are dropped from the meme or described as >>> implementation details is the day that meme returns to its GOLDEN status >>> IMO. >>> >>> At this juncture, the JSON-LD definition of Linked Data is inaccurate. >>> >>> You can make graphs that aren't Linked Data purveyors. Thus, don't >>> conflate graphs and linked data, let alone application of the linked >>> data concept to a global data space such as the WWW. The specific use of >>> URIs as part of graph construction is integral to what linked data is >>> about. >>> >>> From RDF to JSON-LD conflation remains a problem. Conflation ultimately >>> breeds confusion. >>> >>> The pieces of the puzzle: >>> >>> 1. Graphs -- an effective data structure fine grained data representation >>> 2. de-referencable URIs -- critical data structure tapestry (remember a >>> URI isn't implicitly de-referencable, the URL subClassOf URI is) >>> 3. Resources -- data (collections of eav/spo triples) containers >>> accessible from addresses. >>> >>> Current list of conflation examples: >>> >>> 1. Resources -- everything is a resource meme is inaccurate since it >>> dangerous ignores perception media (WWW and Real World are related but >>> distinct media) >>> 2. Graphs -- RDF is the only mechanism for graph representation or that >>> graph means RDF rather than RDF being an option for graph based data >>> representation >>> 3. Linked Data -- to the RDFer Linked Data and RDF are one and the same >>> 4. JSON-LD -- Linked Data is either a subset of RDF or its used to >>> represent directed graphs. >>> >>> Sincerely hoping these comments are digested. I have but a single goal: >>> kill off conflation so we can make progress re. InterWeb scale Linked >>> Data without forcing syntax or data serialization formats on anyone. >>> Openness isn't as easy as folks assume. To be truly open you have to >>> invest heavily in the significant costs associated with choice. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen >>> President& CEO >>> OpenLink Software >>> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >>> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >>> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 18:08:13 UTC