- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:20:38 -0400
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 08/18/2011 06:27 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > Also, I'd like to keep the straight application/ld+json for an > un-specified serialization. My library tries to be intelligent about > creating @context/@coerce entries and use of chaining along the lines > of other serializers I've written. This may not be specified, but it > should be allowed. Currently, the intent is what you say above. Keeping the straight "application/ld+json" Content-Type without a format specified should be used for serializations that are not any particular pre-defined format, but are still JSON-LD. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Uber Comparison of RDFa, Microformats and Microdata http://manu.sporny.org/2011/uber-comparison-rdfa-md-uf/
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 04:21:17 UTC