Re: Hydra CG & LDP NEXT CG - interest in coordination telecon?

Thanks Markus, I agree with all you comments!

In Social Web WG I see need that we draw a clear distinction between
vocabulary terms needed for describing particular data and vocabulary
terms for describing API(s) for accessing this particular data over
HTTP. I already see some IMO API specific terms creeping into AS2.0
specs [1][2] and I believe that we better off with appreciating work
already done in LDP and Hydra/LDF.

I start taking notes on commonalities and differences between LDP and
Hydra on this wiki page:
https://github.com/w3c-social/Social-APIs-Brainstorming/wiki/LDP,-Hydra,-LDF

I put it there from the lack of other obvious place, everyone please
feel warmly invited to contribute or propose different location for such
comparison resource!

Cheers :)


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/

On 10/08/2015 05:30 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On 8 Okt 2015 at 08:38, elf Pavlik wrote:
>> On 10/07/2015 11:44 PM, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
>>>> If enough people expresses interest, I would happily help with arranging
>>>> a telecon!
>>>
>>> I do think people are open to cross-WG collaboration, I'm just not
>>> sure telecon is the most attractive way to do it. :-)
> 
> +1, I think at this stage async communication will be more effective.
> 
> 
>> Makes sense! I just thought about an exceptional one just to take 1 hour
>> to understand better similarities and differences.
> 
> I think the main question would be in what ways LDP Next will differ from the current version of LDP. What's up for discussion and what isn't.
> 
> 
>> 1) I will confirm if one can send emails to both groups, while
>> officially having joined only one
> 
> That should work fine.
> 
> 
>> 2) I would like to invite everyone who
>> uses IRC to consider joining irc://irc.w3.org:6665/social (i don't see
>> anyone using irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hydra) 3) I will document this topic
>> better in this issue on github
>> https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/36
> 
> Thanks. Please also keep the mailing list informed from time to time.
> 
> 
>> I agree that both communities may need more time to understand each
>> others work. At the same time I find it very different to hear (or even
>> see each other) during a telecon, even better meet IRL, comparing to
>> just read messages - IMO it can potentially strengthen the C in CG :)
> 
> :-)
> 
> In my experience, spending an hour in a telecom or meeting isn't very efficient if it isn't properly prepared. So let's first do our homework on the mailing list before we commit time to communicate in realtime :-)
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Sunday, 11 October 2015 12:13:31 UTC