- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:04:57 +0100
- To: Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
> On 30 Jan 2015, at 16:32, Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org> wrote: > > > > On 1/30/15 10:30 AM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> please do not make LDP-specific changes to the W3C ACL ontology, as it >> is more general than that and there is no reason for them to be >> coupled. LDP-specific features should be in a different namespace. > > Don't worry, no one plans to make any changes to the WAC ontology. :-) There are improvements that could be made though. Indeed some of them are already listed on the wiki here http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl#Extension LDP very much needs an distributed standard Access Control mechanism and has for that reason published a Note on the subject http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-acr/ As it happens Web Access Control I think fits the bill pretty well. So we should welcome the opportunity for more people review it, implement it, and suggest improvements. Hopefully this can lead to test suites being developed for it, and a full W3C standard that can be widely promoted. > > -- Andrei > >> >> Martynas >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:44 PM, ashok malhotra >> <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 1/30/2015 9:40 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: >>>> >>>> I think we have a method to set default ACLs for created resources. >>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl >>>> We should have if not. Something I'd need to check on rww-play. >>> >>> >>> Henry, who maintains this Wiki? >>> What is the source of the design? >>> >>> All the best, Ashok >>> >> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 20:05:27 UTC