- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:54:20 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 19:54:48 UTC
I absolutely agree. But there's already an LDP section on the ACL page, I wanted to make sure it doesn't go further than that. On Jan 30, 2015 7:29 PM, "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 1/30/15 10:30 AM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > >> please do not make LDP-specific changes to the W3C ACL ontology, as it >> is more general than that and there is no reason for them to be >> coupled. LDP-specific features should be in a different namespace. >> > > Why would anyone do that? LDP != ACL . > > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > >
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 19:54:48 UTC