Re: Indirect Containers

Hi Arnaud,

Thanks.  I believe that we have tested all the “untested” cases manually and pass them. Please let me know if our new implementation report says otherwise.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Oct 13, 2014, at 17:17, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> David, I told the WG this morning that your latest report had not been incorporated yet. Steve is out today so that probably won't happen right away. 
> I've looked at the report and it seems that you have indeed made great progress. 
> 
> However, we need two implementations for each feature and I think we still have several "untested" cases. 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#indirectcontainer-must
> 
> Henry, I would focus on these if I were you. 
> 
> Miguel & Cody, any chance of an updated report for Carbon LDP that would get us there? 
> 
> Thanks. 
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> 
> To:        "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net> 
> Cc:        public-ldp <public-ldp@w3.org> 
> Date:        10/13/2014 12:27 PM 
> Subject:        Re: Indirect Containers 
> 
> 
> 
> Um, I believe that Callimachus now passes all the Indirect Container tests. We submitted a revised implementation report that hasn’t been posted yet.
> 
> Please don’t remove Indirect Containers.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 13, 2014, at 14:40, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> 
> > There was a discussion today that the Indirect Containers may be removed because 
> > the 2 implementations don't pass all the tests.
> > 
> > Which tests do they not pass?
> > Do those implementations think they'll get it done in the next week? If not when?
> > 
> > Henry Story
> > 
> > Social Web Architect
> > http://bblfish.net/
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>