Re: Indirect Containers

David, I told the WG this morning that your latest report had not been 
incorporated yet. Steve is out today so that probably won't happen right 
away.
I've looked at the report and it seems that you have indeed made great 
progress.

However, we need two implementations for each feature and I think we still 
have several "untested" cases.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#indirectcontainer-must



Henry, I would focus on these if I were you.

Miguel & Cody, any chance of an updated report for Carbon LDP that would 
get us there?

Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM 
Software Group




From:   David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
To:     "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Cc:     public-ldp <public-ldp@w3.org>
Date:   10/13/2014 12:27 PM
Subject:        Re: Indirect Containers



Um, I believe that Callimachus now passes all the Indirect Container 
tests. We submitted a revised implementation report that hasn’t been 
posted yet.

Please don’t remove Indirect Containers.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood




On Oct 13, 2014, at 14:40, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:

> There was a discussion today that the Indirect Containers may be removed 
because 
> the 2 implementations don't pass all the tests.
> 
> Which tests do they not pass?
> Do those implementations think they'll get it done in the next week? If 
not when?
> 
> Henry Story
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/

> 
>