W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Multiple Named Graph

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:53:33 -0500
Message-ID: <5331986D.9050804@openlinksw.com>
To: public-ldp@w3.org
On 3/25/14 4:40 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> So you would want a GET on one resource to return all the triples in 
> the store? ( since you only have one graph )
> How would you implement the creation of an LDPR by POSTing it to a 
> LDPC? Do all the triples you posted also appear in
> this one unique graph? Do they all also appear in the created 
> resource? Do both those resources end up containing the same
> triples? If so you perhaps don't need an LDPC. You just need one LDPR 
> to which you can send PATCHes to.

If this spec has anything to do with Linked Data principles, then please 
remember you can follow-your-nose to a complete collection of RDF 
statements that describe one or more entities. You don't need to mandate 
the use of TriG or NQuad to achieve that goal, since they are simply 
options that can reduce the hops required for constructing a complete 
collection of RDF statements.

The issue here is that TriG and NQuad are options, so they shouldn't be 
presented in examples as the sole approach, even if they do provide some 
optimizations etc..



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 14:53:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:37 UTC