- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:55:33 -0500
- To: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>, public-ldp <public-ldp@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:24 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > I was thinking that there is an additional reason to have lossless paging > which is best explained with the "Volunteering for the army" counter > use-case. [1] > > Given the recent resolution to name ldp:Container what was previously known > as the ldp:IndirectContainer [2] a client doing a GET on an LDPC will not > know > if it can POST to the container without the danger of that action > volunteering > its owner to the army -- unless it has read through all pages of the > container, which > may be close to impossible as argued by Sandro. AIUI, the POST to a container modifies it's membership. In order to volunteer for the army, the client would need to POST directly to the member that offers that service. Hopefully I haven't missed some esoteric aspect of LDP containers during my review? Mark.
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 14:56:00 UTC