hi Martynas, Just to give an alternative perspective, I am quite happy to have LDP uncoupled from SPARQL. For me, the main thing is read/write RESTful APIs based on a great information model. We can then be quite flexible about the kind of backend for that. Roger On 11 Nov 2013, at 14:09, Martynas Jusevi�ius wrote: I'm afraid it would be too little, too late. LDP should have been designed with SPARQL at its core. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> yes, but it would probably be pretty cool if we could align things >> so that LDPCs could be SPARQL endpoints with their ldp:created LDPRs >> being the named graphs. >> >> That would allow us to make a lot of friends on the SPARQL side. > > Could you enumerate the gaps and make a concrete proposal or 3 to close > them? > > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario >
Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 15:07:42 UTC