W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Links and graphs

From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:07:09 +0000
CC: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8BD93BFB-7C0C-4F86-879A-242055EAE356@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>

hi Martynas, 

Just to give an alternative perspective, I am quite happy to have LDP uncoupled from SPARQL. For me, the main thing is read/write RESTful APIs based on a great information model. We can then be quite flexible about the kind of backend for that. 

Roger


On 11 Nov 2013, at 14:09, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

I'm afraid it would be too little, too late. LDP should have been
designed with SPARQL at its core.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> yes, but it would probably be pretty cool if we could align things
>> so that LDPCs could be SPARQL endpoints with their ldp:created LDPRs
>> being the named graphs.
>> 
>> That would allow us to make a lot of friends on the SPARQL side.
> 
> Could you enumerate the gaps and make a concrete proposal or 3 to close
> them?
> 
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
> 



Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 15:07:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:36 UTC