Re: Links and graphs from Martynas Jusevicius on 2013-11-11 (public-ldp@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Martynas Jusevicius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:09:03 +0100
To: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAE35VmydVe2gbum-g-rbbxL_+a3yCHLHnPTu+-5txof2R_t+xg@mail.gmail.com>

I'm afraid it would be too little, too late. LDP should have been
designed with SPARQL at its core.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> yes, but it would probably be pretty cool if we could align things
>> so that LDPCs could be SPARQL endpoints with their ldp:created LDPRs
>> being the named graphs.
>>
>> That would allow us to make a lot of friends on the SPARQL side.
>
> Could you enumerate the gaps and make a concrete proposal or 3 to close
> them?
>
> Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
>

Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 14:09:34 UTC