- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:12:32 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: public-ldp@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5150CBD0.5030203@openlinksw.com>
On 3/25/13 4:42 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 25 Mar 2013, at 20:36, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> RDF suffers from an over conflated narrative. This has been an ongoing problem for too many years. > And changing RDF's media type fixes this how? > > Richard > > I am not suggesting a change of RDF's media types. I am suggesting the creation of a media type specifically for RDF based Linked Data. Why? Because, RDF != Linked Data or RDF Linked Data. Thus, for those tools that believe RDF == RDF based Linked Data, existing RDF media types are fine. On the other hand, for those that think otherwise, there's also a solution in the form of a specific media type for RDF based Linked Data. The definition of this media type will spell out URI usage and behavioral expectations outlined TimBL's meme. RDF enables the construction of RDF (model) based Linked Data that scales to the Web, subject to specific URI behavior i.e., indirection (explicitly via hashless HTTP URIs or implicitly via hash based HTTP URIs) aided denotation that binds URI referent to its description document. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 22:12:55 UTC