- From: Martynas Jusevicius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:09:43 +0200
- To: "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@apache.org>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, agarrote@usal.es
Hello all, in 2010 Antonio Garrote presented a paper which is directly relevant to the design of read-write Linked Data Platform: "A Formal Definition of RESTful Semantic Web Services" http://antoniogarrote.github.com/clj-plaza/assets/WSREST2010paper.pdf There is also a more readable specification of "RESTful semantic resources" and their implementation based on Antonio's Plaza library: http://antoniogarrote.github.com/clj-plaza/documentation/2010/04/30/rest.html http://antoniogarrote.github.com/clj-plaza/ Graphity implements very similar functionality using SPARQL service, URI and SPARQL (SPIN) templates. Draft specification of its Linked Data server and server processor can be found here: https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-ldp/wiki/Linked-Data-server-specification These Linked Data models described in are most likely not the final, and there is probably other relevant research and/or implementations (please add if you know). What they make pretty obvious is that there are underlying formal models of a RESTful LDP. The question is, to what extent has the WG evaluated this kind of research and implementations? If it has not, why not, and is it planning to? Martynas graphity.org
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 11:10:10 UTC