- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:19:09 +0100
- To: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 22:19:37 UTC
I agree with James that a MUST is too strong here; LDP servers should be allowed to behave differently. Jame's googlebot example is a very relevant one, I think. I'm not sure I'm in favour of removing the section completely, but definitely make it less constraining. pa On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:13 PM, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hello ldp wg, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130307/#http-get says: > 4.2.3 LDPR servers may provide representations of the requested > LDPR beyond those necessary to conform to this specification, > using standard HTTP content negotiation. If the client does not > indicate a preference, text/turtle must be returned. > > Googlebot (and many other crawlers) have an accept header of */*. Many > LDP implementations will want to return HTML for google (and others) to > index. However, section 4.2.3 (above) indicates that Turtle should be > sent to googlebot. I think this section should be removed. > > Regards, > James > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 22:19:37 UTC