- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 12:18:17 -0500
- To: Elli Schwarz <eliezer_schwarz@yahoo.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJM-Rdq4ZTjvx_EVi5YaxZ14rA-jM604_dP3QjO9nbsFj_M4+g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Elli. It doesn't look like anybody has responded to you yet, so, I will at least acknowledge that we've got the message. We still have a heavy focus on a handful of other issues right now, but the group will be visiting your feedback soon; I'll make sure of it. Your active participation is much appreciated. - Cody On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Elli Schwarz wrote: > LDP Working Group: > > In section 5.1.3 Paging, and specifically in 5.3.6.3, you describe that > for the last page of a container (or resource after adoption of ISSUE-33) > should contain a value of rdf:nil for the ldp:nextPage attribute. By the > way, thank you for allowing paging for LDPRs as well! > > In my scenario, I have a set of SPARQL CONSTRUCT queries that I use to > create the RDF data when the user does a GET on an LDPC or LDPR URL. (I use > URL path parameters as parameters in my SPARQL query to get specific > results.) Due to my use of SPARQL CONSTRUCT, I have no way of knowing > whether I'm serving the last page or not. I use LIMIT and OFFSET with ORDER > BY in my SPARQL query to get back a certain number of query solution sets > per page, but there's no way to know if the next offset will produce more > data. Because of this, there's no way for me to know the last page. > > Since my system directly returns the SPARQL CONSTRUCT results, I would > prefer that I wouldn't have the server perform other queries to determine > if there's more data, nor would I want to cache a somewhat larger result > set so I can see if there's more data. I understand that LDP isn't > tied directly to using SPARQL, so the fact that I can't get this info > from SPARQL isn't a problem for LDP per se. However, I would suspect that > my case is a typical use case. I don't think people are storing ldp: > predicates directly in their data, so one way to add it is to use SPARQL > CONSTRUCT queries to return their data in a format conforming to the LDP > spec. Is there something else we can do instead of requiring rdf:nil as a > pointer to the last page? > > Thank you, > Elli Schwarz > -- Cody Burleson Enterprise Web Architect, Base22 Mobile: +1 (214) 702-6338 Skype: codyburleson Email: cody@base22.com Blog: codyburleson.com * <http://base22.com>* * * *Check my free/busy time.<http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=cody.burleson%40base22.com&ctz=America/Chicago%20> *
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: base22.gif
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 17:18:45 UTC