On 6/4/13 5:26 PM, David Booth wrote: > On 06/04/2013 04:14 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: >> On 06/04/2013 03:13 PM, Henry Story wrote: >>> >>> On 4 Jun 2013, at 20:21, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > [ . . . ] >>>> At most, RDF is HTTP friendly. For example, that's why SPARQL does not >>>> operate on datasets living on the web (the dataset is behind the >>>> service), and you need to interact with the resources through the >>>> service, whether they are HTTP URIs or not. >>> >>> I am not familiar enough with SPARQL, so I'll leave that be. >>> I am familiar with HTTP though, and that is more important >>> and more widely used. >> >> Where -- other than in LDP -- have you seen people defining how to >> interact with RDF using HTTP? > > The SPARQL Graph Store Protocol defines a standard way to manage and > interact with a collection of RDF graphs: > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/ > > David > > Yep! Here's the problem, LDP (for all intents and purposes) is aimed at resolving the same problem modulo SPARQL. I mean, that's the actual fact of the matter, for better or worse. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 21:29:02 UTC