W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-19: Adressing more error cases, as is

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:26:22 -0400
Message-ID: <51AE5B7E.8040307@dbooth.org>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Mark Baker <mark@zepheira.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-ldp@w3.org" <public-ldp@w3.org>
On 06/04/2013 04:14 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 03:13 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>>
>> On 4 Jun 2013, at 20:21, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:
[ . . . ]
>>> At most, RDF is HTTP friendly. For example, that's why SPARQL does not
>>> operate on datasets living on the web (the dataset is behind the
>>> service), and you need to interact with the resources through the
>>> service, whether they are HTTP URIs or not.
>>
>> I am not familiar enough with SPARQL, so I'll leave that be.
>> I am familiar with HTTP though, and that is more important
>> and more widely used.
>
> Where -- other than in LDP -- have you seen people defining how to
> interact with RDF using HTTP?

The SPARQL Graph Store Protocol defines a standard way to manage and 
interact with a collection of RDF graphs:
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/

David
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 21:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:35 UTC