- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:21:33 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
On 3 Jun 2013, at 22:30, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 6/3/13 3:31 PM, Erik Wilde wrote: >> which would get to the touchy issue of media types. application/api-problem+json and application/api-problem+xml are the current media types, would an RDF model follow what pattern and expose application/api-problem+turtle? > No, since API problems ultimately boil down to entity relationships. The format is ultimately irrelevant. > Agree with Kingsely. This issue is not touchy: it is settled. In RDF you don't need to create a media type for your responses, text/turtle will do. The reason you have to do this with JSON is because, lacking namespaces you have no idea without the media type wha the content is. More useful would be to find which ontologies express the relevant information the user would need. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 05:22:05 UTC