AC feedback on Proposed Rec

Two AC reps voted proposed changes which we should address before writing a transition req to REC per http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl&docstatus=rec-tr#dir-mtg

[[
Minor (and maybe its just me), but this sentence is awkward to read:

9. Security Considerations

... "In cases where authentication is provided fails to meet the requirements of a particular access control policy, the 403 status code (Forbidden) can be sent back to the client to indicate this failure to meet the access control policy."

I think would read better as:

"In cases where the provided authentication fails to meet the requirements..."
]]

[[
Great work!

Not sure if it's a misunderstanding of mine or a typo but in example 4, 6 and 16 I would replace "http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#RDFSource" by "http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#DirectContainer".
If it is a misunderstanding it could be worth making it clear why the usage of the more general class is preferred to using the more specific type of the container.
]]
-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 14:59:15 UTC