- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:14:40 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54ECBF90.8040801@openlinksw.com>
On 2/24/15 12:35 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > All, > > Apologies again for missing the call yesterday. > > A quick question: Is there a technical or political reason why the > registration of isdescribedby in the LDP spec does not state that it's > the inverse relationship of describes? Is this is the unwritten > intent, however? > > Thanks, > > Rob As far as I know, this isn't for technical or political reasons. More to do with the fact that sometimes these obvious issues get overlooked during spec construction. One little issue might be IANA domain HTTP URIs not resolving to RDF documents (e.g., at least TURTLE and/or JSON-LD notation) [1]. [1] https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/39#issuecomment-75502652 . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 18:15:09 UTC