- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:35:53 -0800
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, simeon@cs.cornell.edu
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:36:20 UTC
All, Apologies again for missing the call yesterday. A quick question: Is there a technical or political reason why the registration of isdescribedby in the LDP spec does not state that it's the inverse relationship of describes? Is this is the unwritten intent, however? Thanks, Rob -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 17:36:20 UTC