W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Recharter scope

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:16:44 -0500
Message-ID: <546A81DC.9030706@oracle.com>
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
See inline
All the best, Ashok
On 11/17/2014 3:24 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Per our discussion on today's call I invite everyone to help develop the list of questions that defines the scope of the new WG we would propose to charter. We could change the format if we want to but that's secondary. Here is the updated list based on today's discussion:
> 1. How can retrieval of a container and its contained resources be combined so that fewer HTTP operations are required than it is necessary with LDP 1.0?
Let me explain what I meant to say on the call.  If you do a GET on a container you get the URLs of its members.  If you use a header, say INLINE, you get the contents of the members (inlined) as well. If the result gets too big you need to page.
> 2. How can multiple resources be created with a single HTTP request?
Not critical from our POV.
> 3. How can a client request filtering what part of a resource or container the server is to return?
Yes, we need some sort of query functionality.  Note that you could be querying JSON docs.
> 4. How can a client be notified when something, such as a resource or set of resources, changes?
Important.  Perhaps a bit lower priority than Query and Access Control.
> 5. How can a client find out whether a service endpoint, such as a SPARQL endpoint, is associated with a resource or set of resources?
> 6. How can access to a resource be controlled?
Yes.  This is important.
> 7. How can a client have greater control of how paging is done (size, sorting, etc.)?"
Yes.  This is important
> 8. How can a client learn what property constraints there are when creating or updating a resource?"
Do you mean "how to get the schema for a document(s)?"
> 9. How can we do efficient transfer of LDP resources, either some initial set or rolling updates (feed) of changes?
Yes.  Lower priority
> Please, propose changes and additions as you see fit, as well as deletions if you think that's appropriate.
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM Software Group
Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 23:17:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:52 UTC