- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:01:49 -0500
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 10, 2014, at 09:54 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> My feeling these days is pretty much every (non-aggregate) resource has roughly 5-50 triples. Any photo or video has a bunch of metadata, certainly.
[[citation needed]]
Certainly a large number of DBpedia resources have many more
than 50 triples. I haven't dug into many other data sets
to check their resource triple counts.
Building things based on the above feeling doesn't feel wise
to me. At the least, more anecdata is necessary. Better if
we could get sufficient sample size for valid statistical
analysis.
Ted
--
A: Yes. http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
// http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 15:02:16 UTC