- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:55:04 +0100
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nandana.cse@gmail.com>
- CC: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>, Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Jakob Frank <jakob.frank@salzburgresearch.at>
Hi Nandana, On 20/03/14 19:59, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > I was trying to find where it says Link header is a response header in > RFC2616 [1] and RFC5988 [2] without much luck. Could you please point to > the specific section ? There is not such formal distinction in HTTP. But as we interpret RFC5988 the purpose and the semantics of the Link header is clearly server-side, it does not make much sense to be sent by a client. But this just our interpretation, we could be wrong... Clarification of this may be required before going to CR. We should find a header with the proper semantics to declare the interaction model requested by the client. Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Senior Researcher Knowledge and Media Technologies Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Friday, 21 March 2014 08:55:34 UTC