Re: LDPR vs LDPC interaction models from Nandana Mihindukulasooriya on 2014-03-20 (public-ldp-wg@w3.org from March 2014)

From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:01:49 +0100
To: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
Cc: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>, Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Jakob Frank <jakob.frank@salzburgresearch.at>
Message-ID: <CAAOEr1n=jA9zXdfDUux425RowLe91wYhGXe0iKo9sDG_AGSR2g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sergio,

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sergio Fernández <
sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:

>
> Implementing the latest draft in Marmotta, we have came back to this
> detail. And we have realized the Link header is a response header in HTTP
> 1.1, so should not be used in requests.
>

I was trying to find where it says Link header is a response header in
RFC2616 [1] and RFC5988 [2] without much luck. Could you please point to
the specific section ?

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] - https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
[2] - https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5988.txt

Received on Thursday, 20 March 2014 19:02:34 UTC