- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:19:12 -0400
- To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Do we actually guarantee that PATCH and GET are isolated from each other? We've talked about this problem with paging, but what about when you're not paging? Scenario: 1. http://example.org/products is a 100MB database of product information 2. Alice does a GET, on a 0.5mbps connection, so it'll take 27 minutes to complete 3. Just after she starts, Bob does a PATCH which modifies the product database in several places Now does Alice still keep getting the representation of the resource at the time she started the GET? That could be very expensive. What if there are lots and lots of Alices and Bobs? Solutions: - the server can do some clever database tricks, maintaining many versions at once - the server can make Bobs wait a long time - the server can make a copy of the database for each Alice I think the answer is YES, the server MUST do one of these (or something else clever to achieve isolation). But I wanted to check.... What the server can't do is just have /products be a file, non-ACID database system, or ordinary in-memory structure. -- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 18:19:13 UTC