Re: Question regarding how to specify preference for interaction model

In behalf of Cody:
That was exactly what we were talking about. Thanks for the clarification.

Best regards, Miguel Aragón

On Jul 28, 2014, at 11:20 AM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> changes now live in editor's draft. 
> Basically, added 1 line after 5.2.3.4 saying that the client 'request IM' syntax == the server's 'advertise IM' syntax 
> changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/28075e82eaf3
> 
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS 
> To:        Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> 
> Date:        07/28/2014 10:05 AM 
> Subject:        Re: Question regarding how to specify preference for interaction model 
> 
> 
> 
> > Though the spec refers (links) to more information about the 
> > interaction models, that information it references is in the context
> > of server responses, not client requests. See below: 
> 
> Is an odd assertion given that you then go on to cite 
> 
> > - If the request header specifies a LDPR interaction model, then the
> 
> which specifically uses the HTTP-defined term "request header".  Request headers are constructed and sent by HTTP clients. 
> 
> Or is your observation that the the syntax a client uses to "specifies a LDPR interaction model" is unclear?  I think we do currently rely on someone to infer (basically, guess right) from 5.2.3.4 what the syntax is, which is not a great choice.  It seems like we could put content into the Clients chapter to render that explicit.
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead 
> 
>