- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:20:59 -0400
- To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFC252C4B9.D8ADD6C3-ON85257D23.0059AA0E-85257D23.0059D0AD@us.ibm.com>
changes now live in editor's draft. Basically, added 1 line after 5.2.3.4 saying that the client 'request IM' syntax == the server's 'advertise IM' syntax changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/28075e82eaf3 Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> Date: 07/28/2014 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Question regarding how to specify preference for interaction model > Though the spec refers (links) to more information about the > interaction models, that information it references is in the context > of server responses, not client requests. See below: Is an odd assertion given that you then go on to cite > - If the request header specifies a LDPR interaction model, then the which specifically uses the HTTP-defined term "request header". Request headers are constructed and sent by HTTP clients. Or is your observation that the the syntax a client uses to "specifies a LDPR interaction model" is unclear? I think we do currently rely on someone to infer (basically, guess right) from 5.2.3.4 what the syntax is, which is not a great choice. It seems like we could put content into the Clients chapter to render that explicit. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 16:25:59 UTC