- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:59:06 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52E70EEA.2040505@openlinksw.com>
On 1/27/14 6:38 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > Hi Kingsley, > > [snip] >> I've just read today's minutes, I note: >> >> [[ >> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-92 by changing rel=type to rel=profile for client >> introspection of interaction model >> ]] >> >> I am proposing the use of both rel=type and rel=profile as a solution to >> this problem. The detailed Turtle based description in my post basically >> triangulates to the very point i.e., using one relation to establish >> the resource type and another to establish interaction modality. > > The issue was explicitly about the interaction part, if possible > without using the resource type, hence the rel=profile proposal. We > have settled on using rel=type though. There is no plan to change > that. > > Regards, > Alexandre. All the better then :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 01:59:34 UTC