- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:38:15 -0500
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Hi Kingsley, [snip] > I've just read today's minutes, I note: > > [[ > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-92 by changing rel=type to rel=profile for client > introspection of interaction model > ]] > > I am proposing the use of both rel=type and rel=profile as a solution to > this problem. The detailed Turtle based description in my post basically > triangulates to the very point i.e., using one relation to establish > the resource type and another to establish interaction modality. The issue was explicitly about the interaction part, if possible without using the resource type, hence the rel=profile proposal. We have settled on using rel=type though. There is no plan to change that. Regards, Alexandre. > > Please digest what I've outlined, its how we can satisfy different > developer profiles (i.e., RDF lite and RDF heavy). >
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 23:38:18 UTC