- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:32:33 -0600
- To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJM-RdrJF=aBOTyExa-T3+8uOPj8jx=F8b40HTv8CwKVVcxeDw@mail.gmail.com>
Team, Recently, we've been discussing some concerns about the current abstract on the specification. Some of us believe that with a little more "chewing" on it together, we might be able to elicit something more informative and perhaps also a little more compelling. Here's what I have so far as a rough idea of what I think is an improvement. You'll see at the end that I just have kind of fallen off with dot-dot-dot. That is because I haven't yet found the right closing statement; I was still in-process. This specification defines a client-server platform and a standard approach > for managing and exchanging Linked Data resources over HTTP. It introduces > the notion of a URI addressable "container" through which a client may POST > an RDF graph. Once POSTed, an RDF graph can then be managed through its > parent container as a single web resource. Resources can be members of one > or more containers and the containers themselves can be arranged in > hierarchies. This enables the development of rich information > architectures, which can be managed using the classic and well-known HTTP > interaction model and familiar techniques such as the exchange of data > using REST and JSON. Yet because the resources being managed are expressed > primarily in RDF, the platform additionally affords all the benefits ... I had also started experimenting with this as a possible alternative near the end... which can be managed using the classic and well-known HTTP interaction > model, yet with the additional benefits of the RDF data model. Abstracted > as URI addressable resources, RDF data can be exchanged using familiar > approaches such as the exchange of data through REST using a JSON format. > Linked Data Platform (LDP) ... If you have opinions for or against, please share. For your convenience, here is what is currently written on the spec as of now: Linked Data Platform (LDP) merges the classic and well-known HTTP > interaction model with the RDF data model to provide a new, but familiar > system for working with Linked Data and related media. Here are some other statements that were made amongst the group. I have already tried to capture some of the ideas expressed by these: - "Linked Data Platform (LDP) defines rules around HTTP access to web resources, some based on RDF, to provide an architecture for read-write Linked Data on the web." - I think Philippe said that he didn't know what a "read-write Linked Data architecture" was or how web resources might describe their state using the RDF data model. I guess he (and the public) would be better informed by something like: - LDP is a language and protocol for using RDF to exchange state between HTTP servers and clients. LDP provides a notional "container" to which a client may POST an RDF graph and the server will create a new web resources. - This document defines the behavior of an LDP (web) server with respect to client requests. -- *Cody*
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 15:39:44 UTC