- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:32:33 -0600
- To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJM-RdrJF=aBOTyExa-T3+8uOPj8jx=F8b40HTv8CwKVVcxeDw@mail.gmail.com>
Team,
Recently, we've been discussing some concerns about the current abstract on
the specification. Some of us believe that with a little more "chewing" on
it together, we might be able to elicit something more informative and
perhaps also a little more compelling.
Here's what I have so far as a rough idea of what I think is an
improvement. You'll see at the end that I just have kind of fallen off with
dot-dot-dot. That is because I haven't yet found the right closing
statement; I was still in-process.
This specification defines a client-server platform and a standard approach
> for managing and exchanging Linked Data resources over HTTP. It introduces
> the notion of a URI addressable "container" through which a client may POST
> an RDF graph. Once POSTed, an RDF graph can then be managed through its
> parent container as a single web resource. Resources can be members of one
> or more containers and the containers themselves can be arranged in
> hierarchies. This enables the development of rich information
> architectures, which can be managed using the classic and well-known HTTP
> interaction model and familiar techniques such as the exchange of data
> using REST and JSON. Yet because the resources being managed are expressed
> primarily in RDF, the platform additionally affords all the benefits ...
I had also started experimenting with this as a possible alternative near
the end...
which can be managed using the classic and well-known HTTP interaction
> model, yet with the additional benefits of the RDF data model. Abstracted
> as URI addressable resources, RDF data can be exchanged using familiar
> approaches such as the exchange of data through REST using a JSON format.
> Linked Data Platform (LDP)  ...
If you have opinions for or against, please share.
For your convenience, here is what is currently written on the spec as of
now:
Linked Data Platform (LDP) merges the classic and well-known HTTP
> interaction model with the RDF data model to provide a new, but familiar
> system for working with Linked Data and related media.
Here are some other statements that were made amongst the group. I have
already tried to capture some of the ideas expressed by these:
   - "Linked Data Platform (LDP) defines rules around HTTP access to web
   resources, some based on RDF, to provide an architecture for read-write
   Linked Data on the web."
   - I think Philippe said that he didn't know what a "read-write Linked
   Data architecture" was or how web resources might describe their state
   using the RDF data model. I guess he (and the public) would be better
   informed by something like:
      - LDP is a language and protocol for using RDF to exchange state
      between HTTP servers and clients. LDP provides a notional "container" to
      which a client may POST an RDF graph and the server will create a new web
      resources.
   - This document defines the behavior of an LDP (web) server with respect
   to client requests.
-- 
*Cody*
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 15:39:44 UTC