- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:18:37 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 18/08/14 22:07, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> On 18/08/14 21:13, Alexandre Bertails wrote: >>> >>> What do you want exactly to highlight in the draft? We are already >>> saying the following: >>> >>> [[ >>> The LD Patch format described in this document should be seen as an >>> "assembly language" for updating RDF Graphs. It is the intention to >>> confine its expressive power to an RDF diff with minimal support for >>> blank nodes and rdf:list manipulations. For more powerful operations >>> on RDF Graphs and Quad Stores, the LDP WG recommends the reader to >>> consider SPARQL Update. >>> ]] >> >> >> I think that it would be clearer if if said the patch was for Linked Data >> Platform Resources: > > That is exactly how LDP-RS is already defined in the specification [1] > so you can consider it as an alias. > >> >> "performed against an RDF Graph" >> ==> >> "performed against a Linked Data Platform Resource" >> >> "for updating RDF Graphs" >> ==> >> "for updating Linked Data Platform Resources" > > IMO, what's important is that it doesn't claim to do more than it > actually does. In practice, it really works against RDF graphs. It is targetted at a subset of graphs as the itself text explains. This document makes no reference to LDP except to say it is the product of the LDP-WG hence my suggestion to clarify the introduction text. Andy > > Alexandre > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#dfn-linked-data-platform-rdf-source > >> >> Andy >> >>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 22:19:07 UTC