- From: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:07:13 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > On 18/08/14 21:13, Alexandre Bertails wrote: >> >> What do you want exactly to highlight in the draft? We are already >> saying the following: >> >> [[ >> The LD Patch format described in this document should be seen as an >> "assembly language" for updating RDF Graphs. It is the intention to >> confine its expressive power to an RDF diff with minimal support for >> blank nodes and rdf:list manipulations. For more powerful operations >> on RDF Graphs and Quad Stores, the LDP WG recommends the reader to >> consider SPARQL Update. >> ]] > > > I think that it would be clearer if if said the patch was for Linked Data > Platform Resources: That is exactly how LDP-RS is already defined in the specification [1] so you can consider it as an alias. > > "performed against an RDF Graph" > ==> > "performed against a Linked Data Platform Resource" > > "for updating RDF Graphs" > ==> > "for updating Linked Data Platform Resources" IMO, what's important is that it doesn't claim to do more than it actually does. In practice, it really works against RDF graphs. Alexandre [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#dfn-linked-data-platform-rdf-source > > Andy > >
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 21:07:41 UTC