Re: ISSUE-81 Suggested Name Changes

Hey John,

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:12 PM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> > I moved the proposals into a Wiki page [1] so we could do some
> > better side-by-side comparisons.  I think we should be closed on
> > what the proposals are, there are a few questions I put inline with
> > some of the proposals (Miguel's and Ted's)
>
> The questions don't leap out... I search for "?" to find them then?  I was
> not sure if those were from you vs others/authors in the original threads.


I called out the names, so I thought that would have been enough for those
authors to find.

>  Do we need a column for the combination of inverse predicate and member
> object (foaf:primaryTopic example) ?  5.2.10 pretty much says it's allowed,
> although we've never discussed it that I can recall... no doubt a simple
> consequence of "unless we prohibit it, independently specified features can
> be used together".
>
I thought about it but the page was already getting pretty wide.  We can
easily scroll though.  Will do if you think it will help.

- Steve Speicher

 Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages<http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe>
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
>
>