- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:41:32 -0400
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7Jrg=WE-gr758H6fGgfJEXeoPRq=MCGAb5W-uAs6GvDabA@mail.gmail.com>
I moved the proposals into a Wiki page [1] so we could do some better side-by-side comparisons. I think we should be closed on what the proposals are, there are a few questions I put inline with some of the proposals (Miguel's and Ted's) [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-81 - Steve Speicher On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:10 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > This message attempts to collate suggested name changes for the membership > predicates in ISSUE-81. > > ISSUE-81 > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/81 > > We seem to have developed consensus at FTF4 on leaving the design for > ISSUE-81 as it is, but changing the names of the terms to be more clear. > The current terms are: > > ldp:membershipContainer > ldp:membershipContainsRelation > ldp:membershipContainedByRelation > ldp:membershipMemberCreationIdentifier > > Suggested changes follow, annotated with the names of the people who > suggested them. > > Ted: > ldp:membershipSubject --> ldp:containmentContainer > ldp:membershipPredicate --> ldp:containmentRelation > ldp:membershipObject --> ldp:containmentAddedMember > ldp:membershipPredicateInverse --> ldp:containmentMemberRelation > > John: > (?c, ?p, member) > ldp:container ?c > ldp:containsRelation ?p > # object (member) varies > > (member, ?p, ?c) > # subject (member) varies > ldp:containedByRelation ?p > ldp:container ?c > > (?c, ?p, member from foaf:primaryTopic) > ldp:container ?c > ldp:containsRelation ?p > ldp:insertedContentRelation foaf:primaryTopic > > Miguel: > I would merge ldp:membershipSubject and ldp:membershipObject, as they > always refer to the same resource, the one that aggregates the members: > > ldp:membershipSubject & ldp:membershipObject --> ldp:memberAggregator > ldp:membershipPredicate --> ldp:memberAggregationRelation > ldp:membershipPredicateInverse --> ldp:memberInverseAggregationRelation > > Roger: > membershipSubject -> domainSelector (or maybe fromSelector, startSelector, > originSelector ... ) > membershipObject -> rangeSelector (or maybe toSelector, endSelector, > destinationSelector ...) > membershipPredicate -> no change (?) > membershipPredicateInverse -> no change (?) > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > >
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 13:42:03 UTC