W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Resource Inlining - clarification

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:47:15 -0400
To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF21C9ABD9.5F6B701A-ON85257BEF.0056AC13-85257BEF.0056B9F2@us.ibm.com>
Since we just struck inlining, this is no longer an issue.


Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario




From:   Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
To:     "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, 
Cc:     John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, Steve Speicher 
<sspeiche@gmail.com>
Date:   09/10/2013 04:17 PM
Subject:        Resource Inlining - clarification



Hi,  

A small clarification on resource inlining in the case of LDPR has 
inlining but does not require paging. The question is specially on the 
following requirement, 

[[
4.11.3.1 LDPR servers that support resource inlining must include a 
ldp:Page resource in the representation describing the set of inlined 
resources, whether or not the representation contains subsequent pages.
]]

If I have a <bug3> resource that inlines <bug4> resource, does it mean 
that it has to act as a resource with one page or could we just define the 
<bug3> resource to be a page (i.e. without the redirection) with 
information about inlined resources ?

Concretely, is [A] correct or does it have to be like [B] in the example 
http://ctrlv.it/id/MzU3OTQ4 ?

Best Regards,
Nandana


 
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 16:05:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:44 UTC