- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:28:15 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <526E9EAF.5030306@oracle.com>
John, is it that much of a performance benefit not make all pages doubly-linked? All the best, Ashok On 10/28/2013 12:42 PM, John Arwe wrote: > I mentioned on the call today some early feeback from EricP. > > In addition to the 2 typos that I'm fixing, this is more substantive: > > EricP> I thing we voted on last and prev being a package, i.e.: > EricP> LDP servers that serve a last page link MUST provide and HTTP <code>Link</code> > > I'm not clear on the WG's intent here. I don't care either way, it's just unclear from the minutes and emails what the intent is/was. > > In both his amended proposal [1] and the original [2], he used a term "doubly linked servers". From the feedback above, it's possible that his intent was: > > - two classes of servers, in terms of the paging links > > - all provide first+next > > - only "doubly linked" ones provide prev+last > > In the approved proposal [2], "doubly-linked servers" was used without definition. I (obviously?) did not draw the conclusion that the linkage above exists. I have zero problem writing it that way, I just want to be sure that all in the WG (even if that's "aside from me") have the same understanding. > > If anyone objects to Eric's interpretation, speak up and we can hash it out on the mailing list (and if necessary, get it on the meeting agenda). If I see no objections by Friday, I'll align the draft with that. > > Since I'm here anyway, one further note: as detailed in the action [3], I drafted changes to align with the amended proposal [2] (adds link rel=collection) AND generalized it so that it CAN apply to resources other then LDPRs (any HTTP resource, now, although LDP only says how LDPR pages could be combined for re-form [a potentially incomplete copy of] the paged resource's state). > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0081.html > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0055.html > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/105 > > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages <http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe> > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario >
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 17:28:46 UTC