- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:12:29 +0100
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <7b74cbeea19fb20d0f200cb8298a59ef@mail.gmail.com>
Regrets - I can’t attend this telecon. However, I note that the agenda includes a UC&R topic (see below). Please go ahead and discuss this - I’m happy for UC&R to be published as it stands unless any objections are raised on the telecom. If anybody wants to review one thing in advance of the call then take a look a look at Section 5 Requirements, which should be consistent with the current spec. < https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-ucr.html#requirements>. Anything that has been deferred should be struck though. == Proposal: Publish Use Cases & Requirements == * SteveB reported that the latest editor's draft is ready for publication: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldp-ucr.html *From:* Arnaud Le Hors [mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com] *Sent:* 03 October 2013 18:41 *To:* public-ldp-wg@w3.org *Subject:* LDP agenda for October 7 Hi, The agenda for Monday's call is available: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.10.07 Please, note that I'm putting three proposals for vote by the WG and people should be prepared to take position on that. My feeling is these are low hanging fruits while the rest seems to need more discussion. I tried to distinguish these clearly on the agenda. As always discussions may lead to additional proposals during the call. And if there are other proposals one thinks are ready for vote, please, let me know. Thanks. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 10:12:55 UTC