- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:01:05 -0800
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 15:24:46 UTC
Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 11/12/2013 02:04:18 AM: > On 11 Nov 2013, at 23:20, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > We've heard, repeatedly, that the notion of membership is not > bound to whether a resource is created by POSTing to an LDPC. Steve > Speicher said it again today on the call: > > "there are a number of existing data structures that, when I bring > them online [in LDP], I didn't create anything " > > > > John added: > > "I thought that "membership triples" today were there to tell > clients how to enumerate members of the container; does not matter > how they came to be members (post, put,... , out of band)." > > > > I don't think ignoring that is helpful. > > I am not at all ignoring that. My definition contains > an "or": > - either an LDPR is created through a POST > - or if an LDPR is DELETEd the LDPC needs to remove the membership triples > > (see http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Member ) My bad. I had read it as an and somehow. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 15:24:46 UTC