- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:59:16 -0500
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF6FB82CAE.27C699F6-ON85257C1B.005CC1F8-85257C1B.005D5184@us.ibm.com>
> >LDP sorting only describes the relationship between (sub)sets (wrt the > >entire collection) of members on *different* pages, it does not say > >anything about the order of members on a single page (nor would saying > >that really make much sense > > when dealing with RDF). > > not sure why that wouldn't make much sense. wouldn't it actually make a > lot of sense, if i am building a UI that tried to list 100 entries, i can > get sorted pages of 10, but then i have no idea how the 10 are sorted on > each page? sequences are not such a great thing to express in RDF, but > it's possible, and it seems to me that sorted pages may be a more useful Erik, what I had in mind when I wrote the final parenthetical was someone believing that the order of "members" in the *serialization* of a single page carries significance. That's what doesn't make much sense in the same breath as RDF (or Jena as the common implementation). Certainly one can add it to the RDF content if the usage scenario warrants it. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 16:59:47 UTC