- From: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:45:24 -0400
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>, Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
El 11/03/13 10:37, Yves Lafon escribió: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Wilde, Erik wrote: > >> as far as URIs are concerned, identity is established by identifier, and >> nothing else. i think we would enter rather dangerous territory if we >> changed this fundamental concept at the level of LDP. if there are >> scenarios where sameness goes beyond URI equality, then it's up to these >> to establish conventions and/or mechanisms how to do that, but LDP should >> stay out of that. > > You can check what has been done in RFC6249 [1] mostly for mirroring, > but those imply some sort of equivalence between URIs. > I don't think this should be part of the core LDP, equivalence should be > handled (if at all) as an extension. > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6249 Hi, I also think that it is an extension. Kind regards, -- Dr. Raúl García Castro http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~rgarcia/ Ontology Engineering Group Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 11:45:52 UTC