- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Wilde, Erik wrote:
> as far as URIs are concerned, identity is established by identifier, and
> nothing else. i think we would enter rather dangerous territory if we
> changed this fundamental concept at the level of LDP. if there are
> scenarios where sameness goes beyond URI equality, then it's up to these
> to establish conventions and/or mechanisms how to do that, but LDP should
> stay out of that.
You can check what has been done in RFC6249 [1] mostly for mirroring, but
those imply some sort of equivalence between URIs.
I don't think this should be part of the core LDP, equivalence should be
handled (if at all) as an extension.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6249
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 14:37:35 UTC