Re: ldp-ISSUE-49 (Canonical-URI): Canonical URL - how to communicate its value to clients

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Wilde, Erik wrote:

> as far as URIs are concerned, identity is established by identifier, and
> nothing else. i think we would enter rather dangerous territory if we
> changed this fundamental concept at the level of LDP. if there are
> scenarios where sameness goes beyond URI equality, then it's up to these
> to establish conventions and/or mechanisms how to do that, but LDP should
> stay out of that.

You can check what has been done in RFC6249 [1] mostly for mirroring, but 
those imply some sort of equivalence between URIs.
I don't think this should be part of the core LDP, equivalence should be 
handled (if at all) as an extension.


Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.


Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 14:37:35 UTC