Re: linking from resource -> container ..

Roger,
Please, go ahead. Show me what these two triples would look like.

Note that I'm not trying to be hard on you. To ensure we minimize 
misunderstanding we need to have people make more concrete proposals that 
can be looked at by the WG. Expect to see me push everyone in that 
direction.

Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
To:     Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
Cc:     "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Date:   03/10/2013 03:56 PM
Subject:        Re: linking from resource -> container ..




On 8 Mar 2013, at 07:22, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:

Hi Roger, 
Could you show us how you would modify one of the examples in the spec so 
that it provides what you want? 

Well, in the networth (ex.2) case, I could imagine 2 extra triples on the 
networth resource which link it to the two containers (using some 
appropriate (LDP defined?) predicate). 

Roger

Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:        Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> 
To:        "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, 
Cc:        "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> 
Date:        03/07/2013 05:19 PM 
Subject:        Re: linking from resource -> container .. 




hi Ashok, 

>> I am referring to links which resource can use to refer it's containers 
- i.e. a Networth can point to it's Assets and Liabilities containers.
> Roger, you said this on Monday's telcon also but I'm afraid I'm not 
getting it.
> A link by which a resource can refer to (one of its) containers would be 
a URI, correct?

The Networth resource is a URI and so are the Asset and Liability 
children, so, yes. 

> So, how is it different from a back link? 

The "Networth" class of resources says it is composed of its "Assets" and 
"Liabilities". 
So, each "Networth" is the parent to a number Asset and Liability 
children. 

If I de-reference a Networth resource, the representation MUST contain 
information how it links (through outgoing link) to these children, 
because through these child container resources I can manipulate the 
Networth resource. 

OK, if it doesn't work this way, how else do you see the spec allowing 
that manipulation to happen ??

Roger

> Perhaps the difference is that a backlink assumes
> that the resource belongs to a single container and you are assuming 
that a resource
> can belong to several containers -- which I'm ok with.  Is that it?
> 
> Ashok
> 
>