- From: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:55:16 +0000
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C56D66C3-6403-48BE-A9B7-BFAF55A566D1@uk.fujitsu.com>
On 8 Mar 2013, at 07:22, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Hi Roger, > Could you show us how you would modify one of the examples in the spec so that it provides what you want? Well, in the networth (ex.2) case, I could imagine 2 extra triples on the networth resource which link it to the two containers (using some appropriate (LDP defined?) predicate). Roger > Thanks. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group > > > > > From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> > To: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, > Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> > Date: 03/07/2013 05:19 PM > Subject: Re: linking from resource -> container .. > > > > > hi Ashok, > > >> I am referring to links which resource can use to refer it's containers - i.e. a Networth can point to it's Assets and Liabilities containers. > > Roger, you said this on Monday's telcon also but I'm afraid I'm not getting it. > > A link by which a resource can refer to (one of its) containers would be a URI, correct? > > The Networth resource is a URI and so are the Asset and Liability children, so, yes. > > > So, how is it different from a back link? > > The "Networth" class of resources says it is composed of its "Assets" and "Liabilities". > So, each "Networth" is the parent to a number Asset and Liability children. > > If I de-reference a Networth resource, the representation MUST contain information how it links (through outgoing link) to these children, because through these child container resources I can manipulate the Networth resource. > > OK, if it doesn't work this way, how else do you see the spec allowing that manipulation to happen ?? > > Roger > > > Perhaps the difference is that a backlink assumes > > that the resource belongs to a single container and you are assuming that a resource > > can belong to several containers -- which I'm ok with. Is that it? > > > > Ashok > > > > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sunday, 10 March 2013 22:56:07 UTC