- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:05:37 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello andy. generally speaking: great to see RDF Patch being tackled! time to use this PATCH method. if it is solved well, it should be an awesome way to keep collections in sync, for example. one thing worries me a bit: On 2013-06-22 06:23 , "Andy Seaborne" <andy@apache.org> wrote: >The RDF Patch format is reasonably easy to implement - the additional >work given access to the lexer from a Turtle parser is not great. It's >CSV-like. is there really no way how this can be based on RDF itself? JSON Patch (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902) and XML Patch (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-xml-patch) are using their own metamodels, and i think that makes it as easy as possible to produce and consume them. i would assume the same might be true for RDF's patch model. cheers, dret.
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2013 23:06:59 UTC