- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:02:39 +0200
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 13 Jun 2013, at 17:41, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > On 06/13/2013 11:31 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > [snip] >> * Important Note: As I indicated before the spec doesn't currently >> require LDPRs to be typed with something like ldp:Resource. > > I don't see how this would be possible anyway, because an LDPR does not have to be an RDF graph. There are many options here. One simple one is given ISSUE-79's ldp:contains relation one could have other resources just state in their header the Link relation equivalent to the Turtle <.> lpd:contains <> . ie, have the resource point to its container. Now that would happen to also be useful information, as it would allow one to also find metadata there about the resources. Henry > > Alexandre. > > >> So I think >> you're missing something if you only want to rely on the RDF content. >> You wouldn't be able to tell that you're looking at an LDPR. >> -- >> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >> >> >> Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 06/13/2013 07:35:40 AM: >> >> > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> >> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, >> > Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org >> > Date: 06/13/2013 07:46 AM >> > Subject: Re: Discovery/Affordances (Issue-32/Issue-57) >> > >> > On 13 Jun 2013, at 16:20, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> > >> > Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 06/11/2013 11:36:04 PM: >> > > >> > > Ok, so I have spent a day trying to understand what it is that Erik >> > > Wilde is proposing, and I can >> > > get nowhere with it. So please can he propose something that is >> > > coherent and clearly written out >> > > so that we can have some ability to understand what he wants? >> > > >> > > Henry >> > >> > Hi Henry, >> > >> > Are you referring to the proposal to use a profile? I'm the one >> > who's made the proposal and I explained both why I made it and what >> it is. >> > Let's hope we can use next week's F2F to more effictively >> > communicate and come to an understanding if not an agreement. >> > >> > Ah ok. >> > >> > Can you show us the full Link header that you would propose be >> > used by the Server to show what it is you think needs saying. >> > This Link header will contain a relation and a value. >> > What is the value, and what is the relation meant to mean? >> > >> > Then it will be easier to see if one can agree to that, and what >> > the consequences of this is meant to be. >> > >> > Henry >> > >> > -- >> > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >> >> > >> > Social Web Architect >> > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 16:03:14 UTC