- From: Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez <mesteban@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:06:44 +0200
- To: <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <018b01ce6754$8aa81c70$9ff85550$@fi.upm.es>
Hi all, I’ve finally completed the review for the “Linked Data Platform Use Cases and Requirements” document. The full review report should now be on Steve’s inbox :-D, and I just wanted to share with you the main conclusions. The review addresses first and foremost the style, cohesion, and consistency of the document. Secondly, the comments tackle the validity of the contents in the context of the scope of the document and the LDP initiative as a whole. The document can be improved in many ways. First, it is necessary to standardize the way in which recurring sections are written (i.e., the of user stories), and how the examples are presented. It is also necessary to properly identify user stories, use cases, scenarios, and requirements to improve the overall traceability (and that includes adding the perceptive traceability matrixes to the document). Finally, the examples should include not just valid RDF representations but real meaningful data so that the value of the scenario is augmented by showing how it applies to a real world set up. With regards to the relationship to the last current Linked Data Platform draft (March 7th, 2013), it is worth mentioning that not all the requirements of the UCRD are covered by the LDP specification and not all the functionalities of the LDP specification have their basis on requirements from the UCRD. For example, the UCRD defines requirements for binary attachment support not covered by the LDP specification. On the contrary, a relevant–yet optional– functionality of the LDP specification such as container pagination support is not sufficiently motivated in the UCRD. After deeply reading both documents I strongly believe that it is necessary to improve the traceability of the functionalities of the LDP specification to the requirements (and scenarios, use cases, and user stories) of the UCRD, as it will serve us to focus the LDP specification on the requirements identified and approved by the group and not the likes and dislikes of individuals. Cheers, Miguel Descripción: Logo_OEG Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez Ontology Engineering Group Facultad de Informática - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid C/ Ciruelos, 2, Boadilla del Monte, 28660 - Madrid - ESPAÑA Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 10:07:00 UTC