- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:29:29 -0700
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 00:29:59 UTC
Hi Andy, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote on 06/11/2013 03:12:09 AM: > Would the following be an LDP server? > > A vanilla web server that provides GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, HEAD and eTags. If you mean by that that the server only implements what's required by the HTTP spec the answer would have to be no. The LDP spec defines a set of additional requirements on top of HTTP that one must comply with to be called an "LDP server". > > In what way is not an LDP-R -only server? (no -C's) I believe, as the spec stands, a server must support LDPCs to be compliant. There are various aspects like paging that are optional but I don't think you can pass on the whole LDPC. Should I take from what you're saying that you think we should have a level of conformance for LDPR-only servers? > > Andy > > Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 00:29:59 UTC