Re: Discovery/Affordances (Issue-32/Issue-57)

I really don't think one can just not answer the following question:

On 11 Jun 2013, at 22:06, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

> So what you really want is a way to describe that an LDP Resource is an LDPR, or an LDPC an LDPC.
> 
> Now you want to do this with a header 
> 
>   Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel=profile
> 
> which would be the equivalent semantically to 
> 
>  <> ldp:profile <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource> 
> 
> 
>> Isn't that something you can live with? 
> 
> Is that what you want?  The proposal has not been made clear yet.
> 
> How is that such a great improvement over 
> 
>  <> a ldp:Resource .
> 
> ie: 
> 
>   Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel=type
> 
> What is the difference?


Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/